bracket
what should be said.

A curated collection of wild, outrageous, and hilarious profanity definitions and pronunciations for your churning, educational learning, and entertainment.

Results for "Exodus 21:34"

Exodus 21:34

Definition: The owner of the pit shall make [it] good, [and] give money unto the owner of them; and the dead [beast] shall be his.


Explanation: Okay, let's break down this verse from Exodus 21:34. It’s a really important and somewhat surprising passage about animals in the Old Testament! Here’s what it means in simpler terms: Basically, this verse describes a specific process for dealing with carcasses after an animal is slaughtered. “The owner of the pit shall make [it] good…” – This means the person who killed the animal (the “owner of the pit”) has to restore or improve the carcass. It’s about making it usable again. Think of it like fixing up a broken tool after you've used it. “…and give money unto the owner of them…” – This is where it gets a little weird. The person who owns the pit (the one who killed the animal) must pay money to the owner of the carcass. It’s a financial obligation. “And the dead [beast] shall be his.” - This is the really important part. After the process of restoring and paying money, the person who owns the carcass gets to keep the dead animal. It's like they get to keep the leftover carcass as a reward or a souvenir. In short, this verse establishes a system where the owner of the pit receives a payment for cleaning up and retaining the carcass after an animal is killed. Why is this important? This passage is rooted in ancient Jewish law and traditions. It reflects a belief that the animals are sacred and should be treated with respect. It’s also connected to the idea of the "good shefa" – a Jewish principle of fair exchange, where you receive what you give. Does this make sense? Do you have any questions about it or would you like me to explain anything in more detail? For example, are you curious about: Its connection to other biblical stories? The historical context of the law it describes?